Google Fiber workers successfully unionize in Kansas City

In a tally with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) this afternoon, Google Fiber customer service workers — employed by staffing agency BDS Connected Solutions, which is subcontracted by Alphabet — voted nine to one to form a union. They’ll be represented by the Alphabet Workers Union, an arm of the Communications Workers of America (AWU-CWA.)

Workers at the store, which operates out of Kansas City, Missouri, told Engadget back in January that they were feeling left out of important workplace conversations, especially around safety and staffing. Kansas City was the market where Google Fiber first launched, approximately a decade ago. Workers at this store skipped straight to petitioning the NLRB for union recognition because, for reasons unknown, the supermajority of union card-signers were seemingly ignored by Google and BDS alike. At the time Emrys Adair, a worker at this location said, “There’s been no acknowledgement, no pushback. No response at all yet.” Since then neither company responded to Engadget’s requests for comment.

Among the ballots cast, nine were in favor while one was opposed; an additional ballot was challenged, but the number of challenged ballots was not sufficient to change the result of the election. 

“Our campaign faced many efforts to discourage us from exercising our right to a collective voice on the job. Yet it was always clear to all of us that together we can positively shape our working conditions to ensure we all have access to the quality pay, benefits and protections we have earned,” Eris Derickson, one of the retail associate at this location, told press in a statement today. “We all enjoy our work with Google Fiber and look forward to sitting at the negotiating table with BDS Connected Solution to set a new standard for our workplace to improve both worker, customer and company experience.” 

The Alphabet Workers Union sees this not only as a victory for this specific store, but part of a broader campaign to level the playing field between Alphabet’s full-time staff, and its larger and reportedly worse-compensated TVCs (temps, vendors and contractors, in Google parlance.) “Since our founding we have been committed to tackling Alphabet’s segregative, two-tiered employment system. Alphabet wants to maintain its reputation for treating its workers well but doesn’t want to pay for it. Instead, the trillion dollar corporation relies on temporary, contract and vendor workers to provide essential work for the company without the same pay, benefits or rights as full time employees,” Andrew Gainer-Dewar, a Google software engineer with AWU-CWA wrote in a statement today.

What remains next is for these Google Fiber workers to bargain their first contract, itself a herculean effort that companies have tremendous power to draw out or undermine. Thus far, the specific changes these workers hope to win in bargaining have not been disclosed by the AWU-CWA, though keeping those goals close to the chest is by no means unusual. 

Earlier this year, document discovery by the NLRB revealed the existence of an internal Google initiative called “Project Vivian.” As reported by Wired, the program was meant “to dissuade employees from unionizing after worker activism began heating up in late 2018”; and as it was put in the in documents themselves by Michael Pfyl, the company’s director of employment law, Project Vivian was intended “to engage employees more positively and convince them that unions suck.” 

Initially, workers had applied to have Alphabet and BDS considered joint employers in their unionization application. Hoping to avoid legal headaches and in the interest of an expedient vote, however, Alphabet were eventually dropped.

“We have many contracts with both unionized and non-union suppliers, and respect their employees’ right to choose whether or not to join a union,” a Google spokesperson told Engadget. “The decision of these contractors to join the Communications Workers of America is a matter between the workers and their employer, BDS Solutions Group.”

Correction: an earlier version of this story listed Alphabet as a joint employer. While initially filed as such with the NLRB, those terms changed over the past two months and we’ve updated to reflect that.

Elon Musk’s Starlink is raising prices

It feels like the price of most things has increased lately — that’s the rub with inflation. While many Americans who have experienced the rollercoaster of capitalism before have some familiarity with cost instability around staples like food and gas, inflation, SpaceX claims, is also behind some upcoming changes to its satellite internet provider, Starlink. 

“Due to excessive levels of inflation, the price of the Starlink kit is increasing from $499 to $549 for deposit holders, and $599 for all new orders, effective today,” an email forwarded to Engadget states. “In addition, the Starlink monthly service price will increase from $99 to $110. The new price will apply to your subscription on 4/22/2022.” 

The email reminds customers that, within their first year they can cancel and receive “a partial refund of $200,” or a full refund if their equipment was received within the last 30 days. Several other customers have posted identical emails on Twitter, though the company has yet to respond to our request for confirmation, and for further details. We’ll update if we hear back.

Cameo CEO favorably compares Web3 boom to the colonization of the Americas

Last Thursday to celebrate the closing of a new $400 million round, the venture capital firm M13 held an invite-only schmoozing opportunity in the former offices of Musical.ly, opening with a introductory chat on “the future of crypto, the decentralized web, and creators.” Curiously, one of the guests was Cameo’s Steven Galanis who, according to audio provided to Engadget by an attendee, took the opportunity to share a metaphor he apparently has deployed before: that the rampant speculation around Web3 is akin to the colonization of the Americas by Europeans. To be clear, he seems to think of both as good things.

Cameo, the service that hit unicorn status last May and allows anyone to book a short, custom video message from celebrities and pseudo-celebrities like Fran Drescher, Gilbert Gottfried or the guy who played Hagrid, is not a Web3 business in any sense — not that “Web3” itself is a particularly meaningful or well-defined piece of terminology. 

But Galanis seems to have become something of a booster for these loosely conjoined elements of emergent tech. His Twitter profile picture is of toga- and 3D glasses-wearing Bored Ape NFT, for which he seems to have paid 100 ETH — the equivalent of around $300,000 at the time. He steered Cameo toward minting its own set of NFTs (called “Cameo Pass”) last month with the promise that proceeds would be reinvested into, among other things,”exploration of further Web3 projects focused on fan/talent interactions.” 

Presumably this enthusiasm — a contrast to the oftenchilly reception towards NFTs at other tech companies — helped land Galanis on stage for M13’s shindig, along with Lightning Labs’s Liz Stark. But in the course of his enthusiastic boosterism he shared “the analogy that I like to give people” about Web3, which we’ve edited for clarity (emphasis ours):

“I actually think right now it’s like 1493. Columbus has just gotten back from the New World. And he’s going to the King of Spain and the Queen of Spain, Ferdinand and Isabella, and he’s like ‘there’s a whole world over there that like, there’s literally just gold coming out of rivers.’ And then the King of France hears about it, the Kingdom of England hears about it. And what does everybody decide? We need to start building boats. So right now we’re in this age where everybody’s building boats. Everybody’s trying to go to this New World. […] So everybody’s going over, there’s gonna mutinies on some boats. Somebody’s gonna hit an iceberg. […] But somebody is gonna end up on Manhattan, like in the digital world, and they’re gonna pull a bunch of beads out of their pocket, and they’re going to make the best real estate transaction of all time.”

It boggles the mind that anyone could be aware of the colonization and systematic genocide of native peoples, and conclude that the moral is to not miss out on the opportunity to kill, steal and swindle again for personal gain. Or that if someone were to sincerely believe something quite so awful, they would at least have the good sense not to share that opinion, apparently, on multiple occasions.

Beyond the blunt insensitivity of the remarks, Galanis seems to have little to no grasp of the events he references. “Everybody is building boats!!!? This is a sort of 20th [century] arms race point of view,” William Fowler, a professor emeritus of history at Northeastern, told Engadget via email. “England sent Cabot (1497) West, but that did not result in much. Not until Jamestown, 1607, did England, through a private company, establish a permanent colony in America. 

As for their naval power, England barely made it through the Armada, 1588, and did not have a first class navy until [the] mid 17th [century] … France sent Cartier (1534), but it would be almost one hundred years before they got serious in Canada.” All of this is to say nothing of the fact that Columbus was far from the first European to stumble onto the Americas (that distinction likely goes to the Vikings) or that he “went to his grave (1506) believing he had found a route to the Indies,” according to Fowler.

The tale of Manhattan’s land rights being bought out from under native people by the Dutch for baubles is, at best, highly exaggerated. Unlike Staten Island or other areas of land, the contract between the Dutch and native peoples for Manhattan is either lost or never existed, and according to the Gotham Center’s Richard Howe “the extant evidence for the Dutch purchase of Manhattan is scant, indirect and circumstantial.” 

While a letter claiming a transfer occurred, dated November 7 1626, does survive, it’s both inconclusive and in no way mentions “beads” — rather that the land had been purchased “for the value of 60 guilders” (which is something like $1,000 in today’s dollars.) Whether native tribes shared the same understanding of property, or could be said to have freely entered into these types of contracts is unresolved. Nor is it known if the people who allegedly signed over the deed were even the tribe primarily occupying Manhattan at the time.

Whatever the case, this “investment” was short-lived, and New Amsterdam was “taken easily by the British,” according to Fowler, in 1664, less than 20 years after the rights were supposedly sold for a song. Let’s not even get into how the metaphor fails on a structural level in that Web3 isn’t a valuable resource simply awaiting discovery and exploitation. Its illusion of riches shares more in common with El Dorado than the “New World.”

It might appear unfair to expect Galanis to have studied history, rather than basing offensive flights of fancy on colonialist myths. Then again, history was the man’s area of study at Duke. Engadget made several attempts to contact Cameo to allow Galanis to explain precisely what he might have meant by this analogy, and have yet to hear back. “Trying to apply 21st [century] criteria to ages past should be done with great care,” professor Fowler wrote, “[Galanis] may have something to say, but it is hard to dig through the rhetoric to get to his point, if he has any.”

Have a tip to share? Download Signal messenger for iOS or Android and text me confidentially at 646 983 9846.